Because Oswald let himself be fooled by Hemming - Oswald let himself become part of the plot. Weberman that he himself called Lee Harvey Oswald the night before the JFK murder, and offered Oswald double the market price of his rifle if he would only bring it to the TSBD the next morning. (4) Lee Harvey Oswald left himself wide open to be fooled by the JFK plotters - and even let his own rifle fall into their hands! So, even against his will, Oswald was part of the plot. That's what makes Oswald part of the plot. (3) Lee Harvey Oswald cooperated FOR MONTHS with the people who murdered JFK.
That is how Lee Harvey Oswald came to be part of the plot to kill JFK.
Oswald fully COOPERATED with the people who framed him. (2) Lee Harvey Oswald was FRAMED for the murder of JFK, and was completely fooled by the people who FRAMED him. (1) Lee Harvey Oswald was UNAWARE that he was part of a plot to murder JFK, but in fact HE DID BECOME a part of the plot. So then - why would I say that Lee Harvey Oswald had ACCOMPLICES? I will now explain my use of this term. Now, I think you and I agree that Lee Harvey Oswald did not kill JFK, and didn't even SHOOT at JFK. In Hoover's Lone Shooter mandate, Lee Harvey Oswald "had no accomplices who are still at large." That's why the FBI stomped so hard on the testimony of Sylvia Duran, who claimed she saw Lee Harvey Oswald at her doorstep with two Hispanic guys, who also talked about killing JFK. Well, Greg, "accomplices" is an ambiguous term, in the context of the JFK murder. Then the world will finally see the enormous value of Harry Dean's eye-witness account of the ACCOMPLICES of Lee Harvey Oswald.Īccomplices to what? Accomplices to his having been framed? Accomplices to his having never fired a shot? Accomplices to his not being involved in a conspiracy?
0 kommentar(er)
